Cinema Discourse

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy

John Lobell – John David Ebert

Movies as Theoretical Narratives


Cinema discourse looks at current and classic movies from a literary point of view. We also have top movie reviews, current movie reviews, film ratings, movie blogs and movie history.
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Exodus: Gods and Kings

Exodus: Gods and Kings

December 14, 2014 By John David Ebert 4 Comments

Exodus-Gods-and-Kings-Poster-8

Exodus: Gods and Kings

Reviewed by John David Ebert

Ridley Scott’s new film is the most recent in a long series of Hollywood Biblical epics that stretches from Cecil B. Demille to Darren Aronofsky’s recent debacle, Noah. It is a much better film than Noah, and makes for better watching than most of the previous epics, which have a tendency to come across as stilted and artificial. Scott opts for a largely realistic tone and keeps the supernatural phenomena to a minimum, even reinterpreting the parting of the Red Sea–which forms the film’s climax–as a giant tsunami event. Thus, the arc of the story’s narrative stretches from the exile of Moses from Egypt to the deserts of Midian and ends with the actual Exodus event itself at the Red Sea. The prior and post narrative structures–the drawing forth of the infant from the river and the coming down from Mount Sinai with the Ten Commandments–are, refreshingly, dropped from the narrative altogether. This gives the film a certain concision and watchability that many of the previous epics do not have.

Myth has a way of compressing the complicated and messy events of history into single iconic images: this makes them easier to store in the memory, for one thing–which, for societies based on oral storytelling is essential–but it also extracts their main Ideas. The point of the Exodus myth is the obstetric birth of the Hebrew people as an Egyptian internal proletariat which secedes from the body social of Egyptian society in order to become a nomadic war machine–a stateless social formation, in other words–that functions as the proto-body of an entirely new society. The Hebrews, wandering in the deserts of Sinai, find themselves in the mode of a Volkerwanderung that is analogous to that of the wanderings of the Germanic tribes during the Dark Ages, or the Sea Peoples of about the same time as the Exodus event–assuming that this event took place around 1300 BC.

But the likelihood is that there was actually a long series of migrations, off and on, over the centuries between Egypt and Palestine from about the time of the expulsion of the Hyksos from northern Egypt in around 1570 BC, down to the chaos of the migrations of the Sea Peoples around 1200 BC. The stele of Merneptah, the son of Ramesses II–in whose time the Exodus is traditionally situated–contains the first mention of “Israel” in the year 1207 BC, so this would be the latest boundary by which time the event would have occurred.

There is also the issue regarding the conquest of the land of Canaan which seems to have taken place in at least two waves: an earlier wave, dating from around 1400 BC, in which references in the Tell el-Amarna letters refer both to a people known as the “Habiru” as well as to a man going by the name of “Yahuya” (i.e. Joshua), already causing chaos in northern Palestine in and around the city of Shechem.

The Moses Event, on the other hand, might indeed have transpired under the reign of Ramesses II around 1250 BC or so, in which the Habiru would have migrated from Egypt to Palestine from the south. Moses and Joshua, therefore, could not have known one another, since they would have lived about a century or so apart. Each would have been associated with conquests forming what later became the two kingdoms of Israel and Judah: Joshua establishing the Israelite basis in the north around Shechem, with Moses and the Levites establishing an Egyptian-inspired kingdom in the Judaean south. (The names of the Levites, the tribe which Moses led, are the only ones that contain Egyptian references).

The name “Moses” itself, furthermore, is Egyptian: it means “child of,” and normally functions as an appropriative suffix in conjunction with the name of a deity. Ramesses, for instance, is actually “Ra-moses,” or the “child of Ra.” But there is also a Hebrew folk etymology which connects the name to “Moshe,” derived from “mashah,” meaning “to draw forth,” which gives it an interesting obstetric connotation in light of the fact that the god of the Burning Bush tells Moses to go back and draw forth his people from the Underworld of Egypt.

Moses thus finds himself in the role of the fisherman of souls who must draw forth those souls from the underworld and make off with them to a place of salvation. Ridley Scott plugs him clearly into this role, so that by the end of the film, with all the bodies of the dead Egyptians that turn up after the recession of the flood waters, it looks very much as though the Hebrews have emerged from the depths of the sea, where they can now begin to transform their lobed fins into legs and begin the arduous process of migrating toward building an Ark for their historical innovation of an invisible god.

Scott’s epic keeps things simple and uncomplicated (one can forgive him for such “deliberate” mistakes as depicting pyramids all over the place in the middle of cities like modern skyscrapers). His narrative version of the life of Moses is streamlined to the basics, and leaves the complicated bits for scholars and cultural critics such as myself to haggle over.

But it is yet another commemoration of one of the Founding Myths of Western Civilization: the birth of a portable god, who can be carried from one social formation to the next, from nomadic war machine to tented encampments and onward to building cathedrals and skyscrapers.

It is important that the myth of the birth of one’s god not be forgotten, even if only in the reduced form of a Hollywood epic that functions as a kind of terrarium inside of a museum where one stops and gawks at the wax figures looking back at one from behind the glass. The facts on the display placard might not be right; and the figures themselves, under the conditions of poor lighting, may seem vulgar and garish.

But hey: it’s better than Nothing.

For those interested in more of my writings on the Exodus Event, I have a new book out about Gilgamesh, Akhenaten and Moses, which can be ordered from Amazon here: http://www.amazon.com/Rage-Word-Gilgamesh-Akhenaten-Metaphysical-ebook/dp/B00Q3848H4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1418517073&sr=8-1&keywords=rage+and+the+word

moses book cover

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Kyle says

    December 14, 2014 at 9:00 pm

    The historical oversight I can’t stand is when pyramids are depicted as being built in deserts just because those formerly lush places have been desertified in modern times. Did this movie make that mistake?

  2. John David Ebert says

    December 14, 2014 at 11:12 pm

    Well, nobody was building pyramids in the New Kingdom anymore and the movie depicts them springing up all over the place like mushrooms. Also, in the Old and Middle Kingdoms, they were normally built in separate necropolises on the West Bank of the Nile and usually well away from cities. The movie has them as part of city architecture, like ziguratts, which they were not.

  3. Nick Sambrook says

    December 20, 2014 at 11:04 am

    John,

    I really need to send you a couple of books that I am happy to pay for you to read, and for your time. Was going to have hardback copies sent to your Waterside plaza address but not sure if this is still valid. I have been reading your articles and books for a while, and you may be one of a small number of people who would be able to get what I am saying/writing and doing.
    You are absolutely correct on a lot of your assumptions and views and your objective analyses are very intelligent and enlightened. You seem to have a many synchronistical links to me too (as you will see from the Cinema and Laptop chapters in the shorter latest book). (eg Monkey as in this article – which you wrote a few weeks after the book).

    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Nick+sambrook

    I should warn you though there is a big difference between observing/commenting and influencing. But I need your objective views.

    Thanks Nick

  4. Chuck says

    February 2, 2015 at 11:44 pm

    Mr Ebert, I’m interested in your opinion on American Sniper. Are movies like this a sign of farther shift towards Caesarism or just a continuation of the Western myth of the lone warrior?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

 

CLICK-FOR-CULTURAL-DISCOURSE

 

CLICK-FOR-VISIONARY-CREATIVITY

 

Contribute

 

Giant-Humans-Tiny-Worlds book cover

 

Post-Classic-Cinema-book
clickforpromovideo

 

Catastrophe book cover

 

newMedia-book

 

CELEBS-ICONS-book

 

Ebert books

Recent Posts

  • Animated Cinematic Innovation Celebrated in the French Alps ~by Larry Ruppel
  • On Annihilation
  • On Blade Runner: 2049
  • On American Gods
  • On Twin Peaks: The Return

Archives

Site

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Resources

  • Articles
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Access Request
  • Help Support John Ebert
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Being John Malkovich
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Inland Empire
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Lost Highway
  • John Lobell on Myths and Movies
  • Privacy Policy

John David Ebert Videos

click for video

Heidegger's Being and Time

click for video

Jean Gebser's Ever-Present Origin

click for video

Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

click for video

Fichte's Science of Knowledge

click for video

Schelling's First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature

click for video

Karl Jaspers' Origin and Goal of History

click for video

Spengler's Decline of the West

click for video

Walter Benjamin's Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproducibility

click for video

Derrida's Of Grammatology

click for video

Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment

click for video

Deleuze & Guattari's A Thousand Plateaus

click for video

Deleuze's Logic of Sense

click for video

Deleuze's Difference and Repetition

click for video

Vattimo's A Farewell to Truth

click for video

Alain Badiou's Ethics

click for video

The Works of Paul Virilio

click for video

Peter Sloterdijk's Spheres

click for video

John David Ebert on The Age of Catastrophe

click for video

John David Ebert on The New Media Invasion

click for video

John David Ebert on Elvis Presley

click for video

On Carroll Quigley and Historical Cycles

click for video

Heiner Muhlmann's Maximal Stress Cooperation Theory of Culture

click for video

On Borkenau's Cycle of the Dead

click for video

John David Ebert interviewed on Kubrick, Gilgamesh and the Dangers of Technology

click for video

John David Ebert Interviewed by the Artist Jacques de Beaufort

 

Click for John Lobell's Website

© 2014 John Lobell & John David Ebert | Webmaster jbQ Media Web & SEO

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}