Cinema Discourse

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy

John Lobell – John David Ebert

Movies as Theoretical Narratives


Cinema discourse looks at current and classic movies from a literary point of view. We also have top movie reviews, current movie reviews, film ratings, movie blogs and movie history.
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / On Twin Peaks: The Return

On Twin Peaks: The Return

June 6, 2017 By John David Ebert 3 Comments

 

Twin Peaks: The Return

Episodes 1-5

Reviewed by John David Ebert

This review is based only on the first five episodes of Twin Peaks: The Return, but I think we can already begin to see the main themes emerging. Agent Dale Cooper has apparently been cloned at least twice by some unspecified electronic force that sends him through circuits and portals into other dimensions. At one point he squeezes through a wall outlet and winds up displacing a man named Dougie, who looks exactly like him and who was disintegrated when he was transported into Lynch’s famous astral red room (red is the traditional color of the underworld and the chevron patterns on its floor are archaic symbols of the watery abyss. The scene with the lavender tower that follows is an updating of the upperworld, the zone of transformation where the soul is refashioned in accordance with karmic exigencies). There are, so far, three iterations of Agent Cooper: Dougie, someone who appears to be Cooper himself (and a “cooper” is someone who makes vessels, in this case astral vehicles) and a mysterious criminal known only as the doppelganger. When Cooper comes through the portal into a Las Vegas house in a suburb, he seems to have lost some intrinsic part of his nature, for his personality is hollow and nearly catatonic.

These multiple souls, as it were, are a modern updating of the ancient idea that human beings had many souls, not just one, or even a spirit and a psyche. Throughout human history, as Jean Gebser has shown, the ancient plurality of souls—such as in Egypt—has slowly over the course of time diminished and simplified to the idea of a single soul. (A sort of microcosmic parallel to the slow shift from polytheism to monotheism which took place in tandem with the process).

But it is precisely under the electronic conditions with which we are saturated that the human subject is undergoing assault. The Kantian-Fichtean transcendental subject, which contemplated the world from the standpoint of Heideggerian Vorhandenheit, is now a leaky self subject to astral invasions and electronic replications. The phenomenon of the celebrity whose image avatar is multiplied to the point of fractal feedback loops is a kind of modern electronic recasting of the ancient idea that the human soul was made up of a plurality of souls—in Egypt, for instance, the pharaoh had fourteen ka’s. Already in the art of Andy Warhol. with its obsessive compulsive repetition of the image avatars of Elvis Presley, Marilyn Monroe and Jackie Kennedy, we can already begin to see the way in which the plurality of souls has made a comeback through the back door of our technologically hypersaturated culture, which routinely generates electromagnet fields within which we are saturated. Paranoia abounds under these conditions, as reality has disappeared from its substrate and become completely phantasmal.

Lynch’s iterations of Cooper, with their elastic hollowness and faint reality, are a way of saying that the human subject beneath the onslaught of the new media invasion has become something of a decorporealized phantom. In Twin Peaks, the body is becoming divorced from its material substrate and so identities can melt, blur and disintegrate into each other, just as they do on the Internet, where identities shift and dissolve constantly. One can never quite be certain just WHO one is dealing with on the other side of the electronic plasma pool.

Lynch is the master of the liquid self, of shifting and displaced identities and astral invasions of the porous membranes that now surround the subject. The cultural immune system around us is breaking down and the self, beneath the onslaught of electronic technology, is losing its immunological ability to discern self from other, or even fantasy from reality. We live now in a world of media generated avatars, phantoms, idorus and electronic ghosts. Our technologies have hollowed us out and now identities slip and slide from one mode to another.

Lynch, thus far, is creating an epic equivalent of Zygmunt Bauman’s liquid modernity. It is the liquid self now that each of us encounters daily through our iPhones, our laptops and the various electric screens with which we have surrounded ourselves. There is no ontological foundation to the subject anymore, for the subject has slipped free from its material substrate and become two dimensional: as hollow and empty as Agent Cooper when he slips into the life of Las Vegas wheeler dealer Dougie. Something is missing from him: he is Peter Sloterdijk’s hollowed out self as metaphor for the electronic capture of the psyche in its interaction with multiple screens.  The human-screen interface is melting and dissolving human subjectivity. Individuals now have multiple selves as multiple screens have replicated them into a vast profusion of image avatars.

Those are my impressions of the show thus far, but it looks as though Lynch will be developing these themes into a grand work for the electronic Avataric age.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Geladaa says

    December 18, 2017 at 5:45 am

    Hello, I think the theme of all your texts: that the post-human, post-historical, post-modern situation we find ourselves in is “a problem” and “bad” is a sad perspective (at least that´s how you make it sound). I´m sure you´ve read Nietzsche; when I discovered him I found it so refreshing, the tone he uses. It´s so heroic, I feel this world of ours where the mechanisms of language and being lay exposed, a bottomless world, is the best of all possible worlds, for those that brave the void and embrace it fully, divinity, the power to go beyond oneself, awaits.

  2. John David Ebert says

    March 19, 2018 at 3:36 am

    I never said it was “bad,” you’re misinterpreting me. I said it was a “crisis,” and that it most certainly is. Every crisis opens up new possibilities and it’s a question right now of finding out what new possibilities this situation presents us. But it seems certain that many of our culture forms are not in good shape right now. I’m a cultural critic: it’s my job to diagnose Modernity and, as it were, take its temperature. If it’s good for you, that’s great. Be well.

  3. asal says

    February 6, 2021 at 4:38 pm

    how would you describe the “Return”? what do you think it represents? do you not find it as repetitive as history is itself?
    returning to the past instead of the future. all that had happened before is happening again with a new form. there are no answers — perhaps that is why “The Return” is constantly the broad option.

    “is it future, or, is it past?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

 

CLICK-FOR-CULTURAL-DISCOURSE

 

CLICK-FOR-VISIONARY-CREATIVITY

 

Contribute

 

Giant-Humans-Tiny-Worlds book cover

 

Post-Classic-Cinema-book
clickforpromovideo

 

Catastrophe book cover

 

newMedia-book

 

CELEBS-ICONS-book

 

Ebert books

Recent Posts

  • Animated Cinematic Innovation Celebrated in the French Alps ~by Larry Ruppel
  • On Annihilation
  • On Blade Runner: 2049
  • On American Gods
  • On Twin Peaks: The Return

Archives

Site

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Resources

  • Articles
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Access Request
  • Help Support John Ebert
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Being John Malkovich
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Inland Empire
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Lost Highway
  • John Lobell on Myths and Movies
  • Privacy Policy

John David Ebert Videos

click for video

Heidegger's Being and Time

click for video

Jean Gebser's Ever-Present Origin

click for video

Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

click for video

Fichte's Science of Knowledge

click for video

Schelling's First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature

click for video

Karl Jaspers' Origin and Goal of History

click for video

Spengler's Decline of the West

click for video

Walter Benjamin's Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproducibility

click for video

Derrida's Of Grammatology

click for video

Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment

click for video

Deleuze & Guattari's A Thousand Plateaus

click for video

Deleuze's Logic of Sense

click for video

Deleuze's Difference and Repetition

click for video

Vattimo's A Farewell to Truth

click for video

Alain Badiou's Ethics

click for video

The Works of Paul Virilio

click for video

Peter Sloterdijk's Spheres

click for video

John David Ebert on The Age of Catastrophe

click for video

John David Ebert on The New Media Invasion

click for video

John David Ebert on Elvis Presley

click for video

On Carroll Quigley and Historical Cycles

click for video

Heiner Muhlmann's Maximal Stress Cooperation Theory of Culture

click for video

On Borkenau's Cycle of the Dead

click for video

John David Ebert interviewed on Kubrick, Gilgamesh and the Dangers of Technology

click for video

John David Ebert Interviewed by the Artist Jacques de Beaufort

 

Click for John Lobell's Website

© 2014 John Lobell & John David Ebert | Webmaster jbQ Media Web & SEO

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}