Cinema Discourse

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy

John Lobell – John David Ebert

Movies as Theoretical Narratives


Cinema discourse looks at current and classic movies from a literary point of view. We also have top movie reviews, current movie reviews, film ratings, movie blogs and movie history.
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / On Iron Man 3

On Iron Man 3

May 10, 2013 By John David Ebert Leave a Comment

I

Iron Man 3:

Reviewed by John David Ebert

In ancient Mesoamerican myth,the superhero was the figure of the Aztec eagle warrior: with the jaws of the eagle wide open, the hero’s costume revealed him as a human being swallowed up into the gullet of an astral creature, for the great superhero of Mesoamerican civilization, from the Olmecs to the Aztecs, was the shaman who could shape-shift into an eagle or a jaguar and commune with the earth’s elemental spirits.

In Marvel’s new Iron Man 3, the equivalent image is that of the opened face plate of the Iron Man suit, revealing Tony Stark’s human features staring back at us from out of a mechanical exoskeleton. The image signifies that in our civilization, the human being has been swallowed up by the machine, not by the astral spirit. The ontological problem is an entirely different one, and so the superhero of our civilization must be able to slip in and out of biological communion with the machine. But in Iron Man 3, the hero’s ability to flip in and out of a cyborgian mode becomes beside the point, for in this film, the human being is becoming excluded from the machine’s closed circuit feedback loop, which no longer requires his services. The human being has now become a superfluity in the age of drone operated global warfare.

The plot of the movie concerns a villain named Killian who has appropriated a formula from one of Tony Stark’s old girlfriends called “Extremis,” which enables the human being to retrieve the plant, worm and lizard-like ability to regenerate lost limbs. Initially, Killian uses this to restore the lost limbs of war veterans, but in a plot to assassinate the President of the United States, he creates a fake Islamist character known as the Mandarin whom the U.S. government assumes to be behind a series of terrorist attacks. But the attacker is really Killian and his army of super-regenerative veterans, and Tony Stark is one of their main targets. They blow up his house and Stark finds himself thrust into the ocean, from whence he emerges. He has lately been suffering from panic attacks due to the attack on New York City in The Avengers movie, and so he has put himself to creating a sort of Iron Man army of drone operated suits that can be remotely controlled, exactly like drones, and so no longer require his physical presence.

The powers of Killian and his war veterans, however, are those of fire: their genetic superpowers allow them to summon up vast reserves of heat in their bodies in order to melt things, burn holes through people, spew fire and so forth. But these were precisely the abilities of a mythical creature known to the alchemist Paracelsus in the 16th century as the Salamander, an elemental spirit which Paracelsus imagined as the indwelling being inside fire, just as he saw Gnomes in earth, Undines in Water and Sylphs in Air. (When you cut off a salamander’s tail, of course, it grows back). And these elemental spirits, common actually to all the world’s mythological traditions compose the very architecture of the earth’s “etheric body,” that is to say, its regenerative abilities.

And it is precisely the earth’s etheric body personified by these elementals that Killian and his army represent, for they configure an etheric attack against the attempt to overcode the earth by the global capitalist consumer Anti World, which has imprisoned the planet on the inside of a mechanized global geo-dome.

In my earlier book, Celluloid Heroes & Mechanical Dragons, I developed the argument that the superhero, in origin, was part of the immune system of New York City, designed to repel astral attacks on the city by creatures from the mythical consciousness structure. But with Tony Stark and his army of Iron Men suits, operated by a central A.I. which he calls “Jarvis,” it is apparent that the superhero of Post-Classic cinema is really part of the immunological structure of the Anti World, which scans the surface of the planet, through the digital eyes of its roving drones, for anyone it regards as not fitting on the inside of this geodesic planetary sphere, people too closely tied, say, to their local soils and their ancient traditions.

The film’s climax shows Tony Stark remote controlling his army of Iron Men drone suits, using them to battle Killian’s army of genetically souped up war veterans: it is the battle of the ancient alchemical Salamander, spirit of fire (which melts metal) and the World Vision Machine of the global order of free trade and corporate interests, which it is now the superhero’s job to protect. Today’s superhero, like big government, is working on behalf of corporate interests, not against them.

In the final climactic battle, in which Tony Stark, for the most part unadorned by his cyborgian exoskeleton, remote controls them to finish off the Salamandrian army, it becomes clear that the ontological status of the superhero is now shifting, for drones are really today’s immune cells in the global world order of Empire: they represent the enclosure of the machine back upon itslelf, a closed-circuit loop that renders the human being outside the loop completely superfluous, just as Stark himself is superfluous in the film’s final battle sequence.

And as though to insist, in a kind of Freudian Verneinung, that Stark is still part of Iron Man, he says in the film’s last words, “I am Iron Man,” but it is no longer convincing and we don’t believe him and we know that he doesn’t really believe himself, either. His drone suit technology has rendered his own deeds unnecessary. He does not even need to be physically present any longer in order for an Iron Man Deed to take place.

He has become his own ghost.

And so, like the army of empty suits of armor that Mephistopheles builds for the Emperor in Faust Part II, Stark now finds himself in command of an army of drones that no longer need him anymore than our real drones any longer need physical human soldiers. It is war at a distance, in which the soldier has been removed from the battlefield, and the superhero, paralleling him, has been removed from the scene of the action.

This is a huge crisis for the superhero mythos, because it undermines the very essence and notion of the concept of the superhero as an originally localized human presence tied to the specific pavements of New York City. His actions were never deeds done from a distance, which minimized the danger to his own body. That would have been regarded as cowardice and unheroic.

As, in fact, it is.

The presence of shadowy authorities who are no longer on the scene is a ubiquitous and widespread development in what Zygmunt Bauman has termed “Liquid Modernity.” Bosses are never on the scene, there to troubleshoot the employee’s problems and to interact with him. They are always “somewhere else,” ensconced in a High Castle, where they give remote orders like Walt Disney or Citizen Kane from somewhere in the depths of their shadowy castles, where they can no longer be reached, and so no longer held accountable for their actions, either. This is the Chinese Mandarin model of governance, for in the days of the great Chinese Emperor T’sin Shihaungdi, he too was unreachable, never to be seen, wandering the labyrinthine corridors of his palace, forbidden for anyone to see him.

And so, the aptly non-existent character in Iron Man 3 known as the Mandarin is quite appropriate to this new form of Mandarin governance, in which the Emperor can send out commands that he never actually has to be held accountable for because he was never on the scene in the first place.

His army of shadow robots, conjured up by the smithy of Mephistopheles, is there in his stead, doing the work for him. The rest of the world is simply expected to comply.

But of course, as Killian’s army suggests, the powers of the localized inhabitants of the earth’s gritty places will mostly, and more and more increasingly as time goes by, fail to comply with such irresponsible dictatorial authority. More shadow warriors, in ever larger and larger profusion will be required to execute these Mandarin-like commands and orders to quell an ever-rising multitude of terrorist attacks and rebellious actions that are cries for accountability to those who are no longer on the scene locally and can afford to use their wealth to rule in their cybertronic fortresses from a distance.

How soon before that army of fire-blown Salamanders comes calling at the gates of these cyber fortresses, looking for accountability?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

 

CLICK-FOR-CULTURAL-DISCOURSE

 

CLICK-FOR-VISIONARY-CREATIVITY

 

Contribute

 

Giant-Humans-Tiny-Worlds book cover

 

Post-Classic-Cinema-book
clickforpromovideo

 

Catastrophe book cover

 

newMedia-book

 

CELEBS-ICONS-book

 

Ebert books

Recent Posts

  • Animated Cinematic Innovation Celebrated in the French Alps ~by Larry Ruppel
  • On Annihilation
  • On Blade Runner: 2049
  • On American Gods
  • On Twin Peaks: The Return

Archives

Site

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Resources

  • Articles
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Access Request
  • Help Support John Ebert
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Being John Malkovich
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Inland Empire
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Lost Highway
  • John Lobell on Myths and Movies
  • Privacy Policy

John David Ebert Videos

click for video

Heidegger's Being and Time

click for video

Jean Gebser's Ever-Present Origin

click for video

Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

click for video

Fichte's Science of Knowledge

click for video

Schelling's First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature

click for video

Karl Jaspers' Origin and Goal of History

click for video

Spengler's Decline of the West

click for video

Walter Benjamin's Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproducibility

click for video

Derrida's Of Grammatology

click for video

Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment

click for video

Deleuze & Guattari's A Thousand Plateaus

click for video

Deleuze's Logic of Sense

click for video

Deleuze's Difference and Repetition

click for video

Vattimo's A Farewell to Truth

click for video

Alain Badiou's Ethics

click for video

The Works of Paul Virilio

click for video

Peter Sloterdijk's Spheres

click for video

John David Ebert on The Age of Catastrophe

click for video

John David Ebert on The New Media Invasion

click for video

John David Ebert on Elvis Presley

click for video

On Carroll Quigley and Historical Cycles

click for video

Heiner Muhlmann's Maximal Stress Cooperation Theory of Culture

click for video

On Borkenau's Cycle of the Dead

click for video

John David Ebert interviewed on Kubrick, Gilgamesh and the Dangers of Technology

click for video

John David Ebert Interviewed by the Artist Jacques de Beaufort

 

Click for John Lobell's Website

© 2014 John Lobell & John David Ebert | Webmaster jbQ Media Web & SEO

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}