Cinema Discourse

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy

John Lobell – John David Ebert

Movies as Theoretical Narratives


Cinema discourse looks at current and classic movies from a literary point of view. We also have top movie reviews, current movie reviews, film ratings, movie blogs and movie history.
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Splice: A Movie Review

Splice: A Movie Review

June 5, 2010 By John Lobell 3 Comments

by John Lobell

[Spoiler alert] First, some personal background. I have for the past few years been consulting on a project called Timeship, a $300 million project devoted to extreme life extension. Put simply, the developers of the project object to death and intend to “cure” it, finding the genetic cause of aging and turning it off. (You can find out more at Timeship.org, and get the book on the project, Timeship: The Architecture of Immortality, on Amazon.) So what was fantasy for Mary Shelley is now becoming reality. Craig Venter has announced the creation of a new life form as he gains the ability to code DNA as facilely as computer programmers code C++. But as in all great science fiction, the core of Splice is not science, but metaphor.

Splice is one of the best science fiction movies of its kind, up there with AI in its investigation of the human meanings of creation-of-life technologies. It achieves its stature, as does much great science fiction, by being not just about the science, but also about the human impact of the science. And it goes further in making that impact be not on stereotypes, but on real, fleshed-out people.

Two geneticists, a couple, working for a biotech firm mix the DNA of various animals with the woman’s DNA to create a creature which they tell each other they will “terminate,” but to which (or whom) they become attached. The creature, eventually named Dren, conveniently has a gene for rapid aging, so that she can come to adulthood within weeks.

The movie presents genetic research and the creation of artificial organisms with visceral reality, but the genius of the film is the play between the activities of the geneticists as scientists and as parents. Should they create this creature? Should she get pregnant? Should they terminate their experiment? Should she have an abortion? How will the creature disrupt their personal and professional lives? What do they do when it won’t eat? When it gets a fever?

The movie brilliantly plays the parental instincts of the geneticists, their personal limitations and neuroses, and their scientific ambitions against each other. It may seem trite to conflate a scientist’s desire to create new life with a woman’s desire to have a baby, but the movie does so brilliantly, and in so doing is as powerful a portrayal of Promethean scientific motivation as we have ever seen in a movie.

The model for Splice is, of course, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Or the Modern Prometheus. Frankenstein explores two themes, the first the presumption of Dr. Frankenstein in upstaging nature and creating life, and the second his crime of abandoning his creature and not providing it companionship. And these are exactly the themes explored in Splice, with its weak indecisive male parent and headstrong female parent.

Both use Dren to play out their dramas. And Dren presents a perfect foil for both of them as she convincingly grows from an oversized embryo looking like a huge plucked chick, to a rabbit-like baby, to an enticing little girl, to a magnificent angelic (including the wings) creature of irresistible sexuality.

Dren dies twice, giving the movie two endings, the first ending the experiment and providing lessons in life, growing up, and parenthood, as well as lesson in the meanings of our new biotechnology and what it means to be human. The second ending takes us into the realm of Resident Evil and Species in order to give the studio a chance at box-office success and an opportunity for sequels.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Single Eye Movement says

    June 22, 2010 at 9:54 pm

    John,

    I do believe the title to this film is actually “Splice”. I really want to see this and I thank you for this thoughtful and informed review. Thank you!

  2. John Lobell says

    June 23, 2010 at 7:08 am

    Thanks. I fixed it. – John

  3. thesecretlivesofcats says

    June 27, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    (CONTAINS SPOILERS EARLY ON. A lot of the plot does depend on twists)

    I was a bit confused by the themes of this movie. It’s the Frankenstien theme–creation and parenting–a given. But there are added elements: recurring childhood trauma, gender-role and actual sex-reversals, incest, rape, and…maybe even…the bi-polar effects of human parthenogenesis. Polley’s Elsa goes from:
    1)A lady who favors her professional scientific life over that of a parent due to childhood trauma
    2)Break though scientist who saves “art” from “profit” by sprinkling a little bit of her magic DNA into a desperate 11th hour attempt to save the day
    3)Co-conspirator, fatigued new parent, and fuzzy-logic scientist along with Brody’s Clive
    4)Re-discoverer of the worst things about the scientific method when Dren reaches adolescence and Clive becomes an inappropriate sexual object and/or she’s upset about a cat
    5)Heartbroken parent/jilted lover[This plot device was written for the target audience of Woody Allen] 6)Savior of “profit” over “art”
    7)Rape and incest victim
    8)Lucrative Scientific Property.

    Being a horrible parent was so much easier in the Romantic era. And that’s just the journey of a single character in Splice.

    It’s not that any of this is un-involving…the movie zips along. It is just that so much is happening, I feel that the characters or plot don’t get to lock onto anything that really shakes you to the core when you are watching the movie. My date and I were unsure what had happened to the Polley character that was so bad…is sleeping on a mattress child abuse? And this is a hugely mine-able theme…that trauma passes on from generation to generation. The line between profound plot twist and shenanigan to keep the pace is really blurry in this one.

    For me, the jury is still out on Splice. I respect and admire director Vincenzo Natali for his fidelity to the science fiction film. And he does a lot with a smaller budget…yeah Canada…yeah Cronenberg! I thought Dren and the other creatures came off well, especially when she became a William Blake illustration. I came into this knowing the acting and themes would require a certain amount of suspension of disbelief and be a bit broad. Cypher, his last big outing in my book, has a wonderfully clinical and generic corporate atmosphere. Cube, his masterpiece, is full of easy archetypes and hammy, heavy–but some surpringly insightful– metaphors about the military-industrial age. And the actors are really into that their roles! Maybe he just needed a better lead than Brody to win me over and suspend my disbelief. And set design this time out…eeeh…should I should get excited that he’s the new guy on the never ending Neuromancer project? Remember how much he got out of a recycled set…so long ago…in Cube? I don’t want to be a hater, it’s hard to get good a good sci-fi flick started these days.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

 

CLICK-FOR-CULTURAL-DISCOURSE

 

CLICK-FOR-VISIONARY-CREATIVITY

 

Contribute

 

Giant-Humans-Tiny-Worlds book cover

 

Post-Classic-Cinema-book
clickforpromovideo

 

Catastrophe book cover

 

newMedia-book

 

CELEBS-ICONS-book

 

Ebert books

Recent Posts

  • Animated Cinematic Innovation Celebrated in the French Alps ~by Larry Ruppel
  • On Annihilation
  • On Blade Runner: 2049
  • On American Gods
  • On Twin Peaks: The Return

Archives

Site

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Resources

  • Articles
  • Books
  • Classic Movies
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Access Request
  • Help Support John Ebert
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Being John Malkovich
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Inland Empire
  • John David Ebert Movie Review of Lost Highway
  • John Lobell on Myths and Movies
  • Privacy Policy

John David Ebert Videos

click for video

Heidegger's Being and Time

click for video

Jean Gebser's Ever-Present Origin

click for video

Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

click for video

Fichte's Science of Knowledge

click for video

Schelling's First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature

click for video

Karl Jaspers' Origin and Goal of History

click for video

Spengler's Decline of the West

click for video

Walter Benjamin's Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproducibility

click for video

Derrida's Of Grammatology

click for video

Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment

click for video

Deleuze & Guattari's A Thousand Plateaus

click for video

Deleuze's Logic of Sense

click for video

Deleuze's Difference and Repetition

click for video

Vattimo's A Farewell to Truth

click for video

Alain Badiou's Ethics

click for video

The Works of Paul Virilio

click for video

Peter Sloterdijk's Spheres

click for video

John David Ebert on The Age of Catastrophe

click for video

John David Ebert on The New Media Invasion

click for video

John David Ebert on Elvis Presley

click for video

On Carroll Quigley and Historical Cycles

click for video

Heiner Muhlmann's Maximal Stress Cooperation Theory of Culture

click for video

On Borkenau's Cycle of the Dead

click for video

John David Ebert interviewed on Kubrick, Gilgamesh and the Dangers of Technology

click for video

John David Ebert Interviewed by the Artist Jacques de Beaufort

 

Click for John Lobell's Website

© 2014 John Lobell & John David Ebert | Webmaster jbQ Media Web & SEO

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}